opal: has quality resource

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gem
Weight: 0.72
, stone
Weight: 0.59
, mineral
Weight: 0.49
, jewelry
Weight: 0.42
Siblings ruby
Weight: 0.37
, sapphire
Weight: 0.36
, amethyst
Weight: 0.35
, aquamarine
Weight: 0.35
, topaz
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality resource 1.00
is non-renewable resource 0.94
has quality good 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(jewelry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(opal, has quality resource)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(gem, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(opal, has quality resource)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(mineral, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(opal, has quality resource)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(mineral, has quality resource)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(gem, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(jewelry, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(jewelry, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(gem, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mineral, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ruby, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sapphire, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(mineral, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(opal, has quality resource)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(jewelry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(opal, has quality resource)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(gem, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(opal, has quality resource)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(sapphire, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sapphire, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(ruby, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(ruby, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(opal, has quality resource)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(opal, is non-renewable resource)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(opal, is non-renewable resource)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(opal, is non-renewable resource)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(opal, is non-renewable resource)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(opal, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(opal, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(opal, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(opal, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(opal, has quality resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(opal, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(gem, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(jewelry, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(sapphire, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(ruby, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(gem, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(opal, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(jewelry, has quality good)