operation: was important in forces

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.62
, functional group
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.60
, concept
Weight: 0.60
Siblings operating system
Weight: 0.73
, raid
Weight: 0.72
, extraction
Weight: 0.66
, distribution
Weight: 0.66
, business activity
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important in forces 1.00
was important in allied forces 0.93
was important in forces winning 0.90
was important in allied forces winning 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(operation, was important in forces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(operation, was important in forces)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(operation, was important in forces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(operation, was important in allied forces)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(operation, was important in forces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(operation, was important in forces winning)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(operation, was important in forces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(operation, was important in allied forces winning)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(operation, was important in forces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(operation, was important in allied forces)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(operation, was important in forces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(operation, was important in forces winning)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(operation, was important in forces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(operation, was important in allied forces winning)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(operation, was important in forces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(operation, was important in allied forces)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(operation, was important in forces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(operation, was important in allied forces)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(operation, was important in forces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(operation, was important in forces winning)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(operation, was important in forces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(operation, was important in allied forces winning)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(operation, was important in forces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(operation, was important in forces winning)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(operation, was important in forces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(operation, was important in allied forces winning)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(operation, was important in forces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(operation, was important in forces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(operation, was important in forces)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(operation, was important in forces) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(operation, was important in forces)