operation: was important in forces winning

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.62
, functional group
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.60
, concept
Weight: 0.60
Siblings operating system
Weight: 0.73
, raid
Weight: 0.72
, extraction
Weight: 0.66
, distribution
Weight: 0.66
, business activity
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important in forces winning 1.00
was important in allied forces winning 0.94
was important in forces 0.90
was important in allied forces 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(operation, was important in forces winning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(operation, was important in forces winning)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(operation, was important in forces winning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(operation, was important in allied forces winning)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(operation, was important in forces winning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(operation, was important in allied forces winning)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(operation, was important in forces winning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(operation, was important in forces)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(operation, was important in forces winning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(operation, was important in forces)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(operation, was important in forces winning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(operation, was important in allied forces winning)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(operation, was important in forces winning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(operation, was important in forces)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(operation, was important in forces winning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(operation, was important in allied forces)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(operation, was important in forces winning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(operation, was important in allied forces)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(operation, was important in forces winning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(operation, was important in allied forces)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(operation, was important in forces winning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(operation, was important in allied forces winning)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(operation, was important in forces winning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(operation, was important in forces)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(operation, was important in forces winning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(operation, was important in allied forces)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(operation, was important in forces winning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(operation, was important in forces winning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(operation, was important in forces winning)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(operation, was important in forces winning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(operation, was important in forces winning)