operator: cost 25000

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.70
, employee
Weight: 0.66
, service
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.60
, third party
Weight: 0.60
Siblings defendant
Weight: 0.59
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.36
, service station
Weight: 0.35
, baa
Weight: 0.35
, software company
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
cost 25000 1.00
cost 12500 1.00
cost more on pc 0.82
is expensive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(third party, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(operator, cost 25000)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(operator, cost 25000) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(third party, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(operator, cost 25000) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(third party, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(operator, cost 25000) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(software company, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(operator, cost 25000) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(service station, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(third party, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(operator, cost 25000) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(operator, cost 25000)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(operator, cost 25000) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(service station, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(service station, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(operator, cost 25000) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(software company, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(software company, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(operator, cost 25000) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(operator, cost 25000)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(operator, cost 25000) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(operator, cost 12500)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(operator, cost 25000) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(operator, cost 12500)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(operator, cost 25000) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(operator, cost 12500)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(operator, cost 25000) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(operator, cost more on pc)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(operator, cost 25000) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(operator, cost 12500)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(operator, cost 25000) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(operator, cost more on pc)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(operator, cost 25000) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(operator, cost more on pc)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(operator, cost 25000) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(operator, is expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(operator, cost 25000) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(operator, is expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(operator, cost 25000) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(operator, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(operator, cost 25000) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(operator, cost more on pc)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(operator, cost 25000) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(operator, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(operator, cost 25000) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(operator, cost 25000) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(operator, cost 25000)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(operator, cost 25000) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(operator, cost 25000)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(operator, cost 25000) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(third party, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(operator, cost 25000) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(service station, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(operator, cost 25000) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(software company, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(operator, cost 25000) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(third party, is expensive)