operator: is expensive

Related concepts

Parents	company Weight: 0.70 , employee Weight: 0.66 , service Weight: 0.63 , person Weight: 0.60 , third party Weight: 0.60
Siblings	defendant Weight: 0.59 , internet service provider Weight: 0.36 , service station Weight: 0.35 , baa Weight: 0.35 , software company Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is expensive	1.00
be more expensive on pc	0.78
cost 25000	0.76
cost 12500	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(third party, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(operator, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(operator, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(third party, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(operator, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(third party, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(operator, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(software company, is expensive)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(operator, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(service station, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(third party, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(operator, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(operator, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(operator, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(service station, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(service station, is expensive)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(operator, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

Remarkable(software company, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(software company, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(operator, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(operator, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(operator, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(operator, be more expensive on pc)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(operator, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(operator, be more expensive on pc)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(operator, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(operator, be more expensive on pc)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(operator, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(operator, cost 25000)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(operator, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(operator, cost 12500)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(operator, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(operator, cost 25000)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(operator, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(operator, cost 12500)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(operator, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(operator, be more expensive on pc)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(operator, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(operator, cost 25000)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(operator, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(operator, cost 12500)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(operator, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(operator, cost 25000)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(operator, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(operator, cost 12500)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Salient(operator, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(operator, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(operator, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(operator, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(operator, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(operator, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(third party, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(operator, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(service station, is expensive)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(operator, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(software company, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(operator, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(third party, is expensive)