opossum: has quality questions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.73
, marsupial
Weight: 0.70
, mammal
Weight: 0.65
, wildlife
Weight: 0.60
Siblings coyote
Weight: 0.38
, boa constrictor
Weight: 0.38
, llama
Weight: 0.37
, raccoon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality questions 1.00
has quality good 0.76
is quality 0.76
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(marsupial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(opossum, has quality questions)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(marsupial, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(opossum, has quality questions)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(opossum, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(marsupial, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(opossum, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(marsupial, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(opossum, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(marsupial, is quality)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(opossum, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(marsupial, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(marsupial, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(opossum, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(opossum, has quality questions)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(marsupial, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(opossum, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(opossum, has quality questions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(opossum, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(opossum, has quality questions)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(opossum, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(opossum, is quality)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(opossum, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(opossum, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(opossum, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(opossum, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(opossum, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(opossum, is quality)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(opossum, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(opossum, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(opossum, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(opossum, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(opossum, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(opossum, is quality)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(opossum, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(opossum, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(opossum, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(opossum, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(opossum, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(opossum, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(opossum, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(opossum, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(opossum, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(opossum, is quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(opossum, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(opossum, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(opossum, has quality questions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(opossum, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(opossum, has quality questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(opossum, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(marsupial, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(opossum, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(marsupial, is quality)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(opossum, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(marsupial, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(opossum, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(marsupial, is quality)