opossum: is quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.73
, marsupial
Weight: 0.70
, mammal
Weight: 0.65
, wildlife
Weight: 0.60
Siblings coyote
Weight: 0.38
, boa constrictor
Weight: 0.38
, llama
Weight: 0.37
, raccoon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is quality 1.00
has quality good 0.91
has quality bad 0.87
has quality questions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(marsupial, is quality)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(opossum, is quality)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(marsupial, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(opossum, is quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(opossum, is quality)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(marsupial, is quality)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(opossum, is quality)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(marsupial, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(opossum, is quality)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(marsupial, is quality)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(opossum, is quality)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(marsupial, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(marsupial, is quality)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(opossum, is quality)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(opossum, is quality)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(marsupial, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(opossum, is quality)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(opossum, is quality)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(opossum, is quality)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(opossum, is quality)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(opossum, is quality)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(opossum, has quality good)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(opossum, is quality)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(opossum, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(opossum, is quality)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(opossum, has quality good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(opossum, is quality)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(opossum, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(opossum, is quality)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(opossum, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(opossum, is quality)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(opossum, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(opossum, is quality)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(opossum, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(opossum, is quality)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(opossum, has quality questions)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(opossum, is quality)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(opossum, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(opossum, is quality)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(opossum, has quality questions)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(opossum, is quality)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(opossum, has quality questions)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(opossum, is quality)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(opossum, has quality questions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(opossum, is quality)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(opossum, is quality)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(opossum, is quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(opossum, is quality)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(opossum, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(opossum, is quality)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(marsupial, is quality)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(opossum, is quality)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(marsupial, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(opossum, is quality)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(marsupial, is quality)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(opossum, is quality)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(marsupial, has quality good)