opportunity: be cost forgone alternative

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents privilege
Weight: 0.65
, example
Weight: 0.64
, tool
Weight: 0.64
, issue
Weight: 0.61
Siblings moment
Weight: 0.65
, challenge
Weight: 0.65
, avenue
Weight: 0.64
, advantage
Weight: 0.64
, happy hour
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cost forgone alternative 1.00
be cost best forgone alternative 0.99
be important cost 0.80
has quality cost 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(opportunity, be cost forgone alternative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(opportunity, be cost forgone alternative)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(opportunity, be cost forgone alternative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be cost best forgone alternative)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(opportunity, be cost forgone alternative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(opportunity, be cost best forgone alternative)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(opportunity, be cost forgone alternative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(opportunity, be cost best forgone alternative)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(opportunity, be cost forgone alternative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(opportunity, be cost best forgone alternative)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(opportunity, be cost forgone alternative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be important cost)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(opportunity, be cost forgone alternative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(opportunity, be important cost)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(opportunity, be cost forgone alternative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(opportunity, has quality cost)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(opportunity, be cost forgone alternative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(opportunity, be important cost)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(opportunity, be cost forgone alternative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(opportunity, be important cost)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(opportunity, be cost forgone alternative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(opportunity, has quality cost)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(opportunity, be cost forgone alternative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(opportunity, has quality cost)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(opportunity, be cost forgone alternative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, has quality cost)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(opportunity, be cost forgone alternative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(opportunity, be cost forgone alternative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be cost forgone alternative)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(opportunity, be cost forgone alternative) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(opportunity, be cost forgone alternative)