opportunity: be important cost

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents privilege
Weight: 0.65
, example
Weight: 0.64
, tool
Weight: 0.64
, issue
Weight: 0.61
Siblings moment
Weight: 0.65
, challenge
Weight: 0.65
, avenue
Weight: 0.64
, advantage
Weight: 0.64
, happy hour
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important cost 1.00
has quality cost 0.91
law of is cost 0.83
be cost best forgone alternative 0.81
be cost forgone alternative 0.80
be important to gilgamesh 0.80
is expensive 0.80
is cost curve 0.78
has quality worth 0.76
be important in business 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(issue, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(opportunity, be important cost)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(opportunity, be important cost)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(opportunity, be important cost)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(opportunity, be important cost)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(issue, be important in business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(issue, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(issue, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important in business)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(advantage, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(issue, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(opportunity, be important cost)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(opportunity, be important cost)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(opportunity, be important cost)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(opportunity, be important cost)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(advantage, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(advantage, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(opportunity, be important cost)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be cost best forgone alternative)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(opportunity, has quality cost)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(opportunity, be cost best forgone alternative)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(opportunity, be cost best forgone alternative)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be cost forgone alternative)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(opportunity, has quality cost)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(opportunity, be cost forgone alternative)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(opportunity, law of is cost)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(opportunity, be cost best forgone alternative)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(opportunity, law of is cost)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(opportunity, has quality cost)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(opportunity, law of is cost)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(opportunity, be cost forgone alternative)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(opportunity, be cost forgone alternative)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, law of is cost)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, has quality cost)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(opportunity, is cost curve)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, is cost curve)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(opportunity, is cost curve)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(opportunity, is cost curve)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be important cost)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(opportunity, be important cost)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(issue, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(advantage, has quality worth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(opportunity, be important cost)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(issue, is expensive)