opportunity: be important in public service

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents privilege
Weight: 0.65
, example
Weight: 0.64
, tool
Weight: 0.64
, issue
Weight: 0.61
Siblings moment
Weight: 0.65
, challenge
Weight: 0.65
, avenue
Weight: 0.64
, advantage
Weight: 0.64
, happy hour
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in public service 1.00
be important in service 0.93
be important in business 0.77
be important for customer perception 0.77
be important for positive customer perception 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(opportunity, be important in public service)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(opportunity, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(issue, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(moment, be important for customer perception)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(moment, be important for positive customer perception)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(opportunity, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(opportunity, be important in public service)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(opportunity, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(moment, be important for positive customer perception) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(moment, be important for positive customer perception)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(opportunity, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(moment, be important for customer perception) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(moment, be important for customer perception)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(opportunity, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(opportunity, be important in public service)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(opportunity, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be important in service)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(opportunity, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(opportunity, be important in service)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(opportunity, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(opportunity, be important in service)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(opportunity, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(opportunity, be important in service)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(opportunity, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(opportunity, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be important in public service)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(opportunity, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(opportunity, be important in public service)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(moment, be important for customer perception)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(moment, be important for positive customer perception)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(opportunity, be important in public service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)