opportunity: be in workplace

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents privilege
Weight: 0.65
, example
Weight: 0.64
, tool
Weight: 0.64
, issue
Weight: 0.61
Siblings moment
Weight: 0.65
, challenge
Weight: 0.65
, avenue
Weight: 0.64
, advantage
Weight: 0.64
, happy hour
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in workplace 1.00
be important in workplace 0.97
be in workplace important 0.97
be for employer 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(issue, be for employer)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(opportunity, be in workplace)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(opportunity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(issue, be for employer)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(issue, be for employer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(issue, be for employer)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(opportunity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(opportunity, be in workplace)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(opportunity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(opportunity, be in workplace)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(opportunity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(opportunity, be in workplace important)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(opportunity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(opportunity, be important in workplace)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(opportunity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(opportunity, be important in workplace)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(opportunity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be important in workplace)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(opportunity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(opportunity, be in workplace important)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(opportunity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be in workplace important)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(opportunity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(opportunity, be in workplace important)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(opportunity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(opportunity, be important in workplace)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(opportunity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be for employer)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(opportunity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(opportunity, be for employer)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(opportunity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(opportunity, be for employer)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(opportunity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(opportunity, be for employer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(opportunity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(opportunity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be in workplace)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(opportunity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(opportunity, be in workplace)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(issue, be for employer)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(opportunity, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(issue, be for employer)