oracle: has quality evil

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents software company
Weight: 0.67
, source
Weight: 0.61
, leader
Weight: 0.60
, corporation
Weight: 0.58
, vendor
Weight: 0.58
Siblings software
Weight: 0.33
, king
Weight: 0.32
, netscape
Weight: 0.32
, sage
Weight: 0.32
, microsoft
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality evil 1.00
be considered evil 0.89
has quality bad 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(corporation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(oracle, has quality evil)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(software company, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(oracle, has quality evil)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(oracle, has quality evil)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(vendor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(oracle, has quality evil)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(vendor, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(source, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(software company, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(corporation, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(software company, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(vendor, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(corporation, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(corporation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(oracle, has quality evil)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(software company, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(oracle, has quality evil)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(oracle, has quality evil)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(vendor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(oracle, has quality evil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(oracle, has quality evil)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(oracle, be considered evil)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(oracle, be considered evil)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(oracle, be considered evil)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(oracle, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(oracle, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(oracle, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(oracle, be considered evil)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(oracle, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(oracle, has quality evil)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(oracle, has quality evil)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(vendor, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(corporation, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(software company, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(vendor, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(corporation, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(oracle, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(software company, has quality bad)