orange: be good juice

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit tree
Weight: 0.72
, red
Weight: 0.65
, flavor
Weight: 0.65
, color
Weight: 0.63
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.60
Siblings orange juice
Weight: 0.39
, purple
Weight: 0.37
, peach tree
Weight: 0.37
, apple tree
Weight: 0.37
, burgundy
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good juice 1.00
is juice good 1.00
have juice 0.96
get juice 0.96
be better than juice 0.93
is popular juice 0.92
has state juice 0.92
get dry juice 0.90
be better than orange juice 0.89
is most popular juice 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fresh fruit, be better than juice)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(orange, be good juice)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fresh fruit, has state juice)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(orange, be good juice)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(orange, be good juice)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, be better than juice)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(orange, be good juice)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, has state juice)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(orange, be good juice)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, has state juice)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(orange, be good juice)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be better than juice)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(orange, be good juice)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(orange juice, has state juice)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fresh fruit, be better than juice)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(orange, be good juice)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(orange, be good juice)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fresh fruit, has state juice)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(orange, be good juice)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(orange, be good juice)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(orange, be good juice)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(orange juice, has state juice)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(orange juice, has state juice)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(orange, be good juice)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(orange, be good juice)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(orange, be good juice)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(orange, have juice)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(orange, be good juice)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(orange, have juice)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(orange, be good juice)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(orange, have juice)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(orange, be good juice)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(orange, has state juice)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(orange, be good juice)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(orange, has state juice)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(orange, be good juice)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(orange, has state juice)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(orange, be good juice)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(orange, has state juice)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(orange, be good juice)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(orange, be better than orange juice)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(orange, be good juice)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(orange, have juice)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(orange, be good juice)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(orange, be better than orange juice)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(orange, be good juice)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(orange, be better than orange juice)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(orange, be good juice)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(orange, be better than orange juice)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(orange, be good juice)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(orange, be good juice)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(orange, be good juice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(orange, be good juice)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(orange, be good juice)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(orange, be good juice)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be better than juice)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(orange, be good juice)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, has state juice)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(orange, be good juice)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(orange juice, has state juice)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(orange, be good juice)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be better than juice)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(orange, be good juice)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, has state juice)