order: be important in process control

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents injunction
Weight: 0.64
, agreement
Weight: 0.61
, protection
Weight: 0.60
, third party
Weight: 0.60
Siblings will
Weight: 0.60
, warrant
Weight: 0.59
, duty
Weight: 0.58
, writ
Weight: 0.58
, reservation
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in process control 1.00
take long to process 0.81
be important in system 0.81
be important 29 0.77
typically affect states election process 0.77
be important in political system 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(third party, be important in system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(order, be important in process control)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(protection, be important in system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(order, be important in process control)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(third party, typically affect states election process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(order, be important in process control)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(third party, be important in political system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(order, be important in process control)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(protection, be important in system)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(third party, be important in political system)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(third party, typically affect states election process)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(third party, be important in system)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(third party, be important in political system)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(protection, be important in system)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(third party, be important in system)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(third party, typically affect states election process)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(third party, be important in system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(order, be important in process control)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(protection, be important in system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(order, be important in process control)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(third party, typically affect states election process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(order, be important in process control)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(third party, be important in political system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(order, be important in process control)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(order, be important in process control)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(order, take long to process)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(order, be important 29)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(order, take long to process)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(order, take long to process)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(order, take long to process)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(order, be important 29)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(order, be important 29)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(order, be important 29)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(order, be important in process control)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(order, be important in process control)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(third party, typically affect states election process)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(protection, be important in system)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(third party, be important in political system)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(third party, be important in system)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(protection, be important in system)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(third party, typically affect states election process)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(third party, be important in political system)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(order, be important in process control) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(third party, be important in system)