third party: typically affect states election process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents political party
Weight: 0.80
, party
Weight: 0.79
, candidate
Weight: 0.69
Siblings green party
Weight: 0.79
, democratic party
Weight: 0.75
, congress
Weight: 0.65
, accounting firm
Weight: 0.64
, time
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
typically affect states election process 1.00
typically affect united states election process 0.96
lose most elections 0.81
be in elections 0.81
lose elections 0.80
be infrequently successful in america elections 0.79
be important in political system 0.76
win in elections 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(party, lose most elections)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(third party, typically affect states election process)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(third party, typically affect states election process)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(party, lose elections)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(third party, typically affect states election process)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(party, lose elections)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(party, lose most elections)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(party, be infrequently successful in america elections)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(party, lose elections)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(party, lose most elections)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(party, be infrequently successful in america elections)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(party, lose most elections)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(third party, typically affect states election process)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(third party, typically affect states election process)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(party, lose elections)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(third party, typically affect states election process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(third party, typically affect states election process)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(third party, typically affect united states election process)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(third party, typically affect united states election process)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(third party, lose elections)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(third party, lose most elections)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(third party, typically affect united states election process)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(third party, be in elections)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(third party, typically affect united states election process)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(third party, lose elections)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(third party, be important in political system)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(third party, win in elections)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(third party, be important in political system)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(third party, lose most elections)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(third party, be in elections)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(third party, lose elections)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(third party, be important in political system)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(third party, win in elections)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(third party, be in elections)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(third party, be important in political system)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(third party, lose most elections)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(third party, lose elections)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(third party, be in elections)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(third party, win in elections)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(third party, lose most elections)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(third party, win in elections)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(third party, typically affect states election process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(third party, typically affect states election process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(party, lose elections)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(party, lose most elections)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(party, be infrequently successful in america elections)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(party, lose elections)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(party, lose most elections)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(third party, typically affect states election process)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(party, be infrequently successful in america elections)