third party: be infrequently successful in america elections

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents political party
Weight: 0.80
, party
Weight: 0.79
, candidate
Weight: 0.69
Siblings green party
Weight: 0.79
, democratic party
Weight: 0.75
, congress
Weight: 0.65
, accounting firm
Weight: 0.64
, time
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be infrequently successful in america elections 1.00
be in elections 0.80
typically affect united states election process 0.80
lose most elections 0.79
typically affect states election process 0.79
lose elections 0.78
win in elections 0.77
fail in american politics 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(party, lose most elections)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(party, lose elections)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(party, fail in american politics)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(party, lose elections)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(party, fail in american politics)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(party, lose most elections)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(party, lose elections)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(party, lose most elections)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(party, fail in american politics)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(party, lose most elections)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(party, lose elections)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(party, fail in american politics)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(third party, fail in american politics)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(third party, fail in american politics)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(third party, fail in american politics)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(third party, fail in american politics)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(third party, typically affect united states election process)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(third party, typically affect states election process)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(third party, be in elections)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(third party, lose elections)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(third party, lose elections)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(third party, lose most elections)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(third party, typically affect united states election process)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(third party, win in elections)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(third party, lose elections)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(third party, lose elections)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(third party, typically affect states election process)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(third party, lose most elections)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(third party, be in elections)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(third party, lose most elections)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(third party, be in elections)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(third party, typically affect united states election process)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(third party, win in elections)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(third party, typically affect states election process)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(third party, win in elections)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(third party, be in elections)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(third party, lose most elections)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(third party, typically affect united states election process)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(third party, typically affect states election process)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(third party, win in elections)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(party, lose elections)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(party, fail in american politics)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(party, lose most elections)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(party, lose elections)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(party, fail in american politics)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(third party, be infrequently successful in america elections)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(party, lose most elections)