ordering: be online better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operation
Weight: 0.56
, function
Weight: 0.55
, process
Weight: 0.50
, step
Weight: 0.49
, duty
Weight: 0.48
Siblings printing
Weight: 0.30
, inventory
Weight: 0.30
, distribution
Weight: 0.30
, loading
Weight: 0.30
, operating system
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be online better 1.00
be online 0.92
is online 0.91
is online difficult 0.86
is online bad idea 0.83
is online idea 0.82
be from deciem 's website like 0.78
is online goddamn difficult 0.77
be from deciem 's website 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(ordering, be online better)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(ordering, be online)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(ordering, is online)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(ordering, be online)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(ordering, is online idea)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(ordering, is online)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(ordering, is online idea)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(ordering, be online)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(ordering, be from deciem 's website like)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(ordering, is online)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(ordering, is online idea)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(ordering, be from deciem 's website)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(ordering, be from deciem 's website like)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(ordering, is online difficult)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(ordering, be from deciem 's website like)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(ordering, is online difficult)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(ordering, be from deciem 's website)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(ordering, is online bad idea)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(ordering, be from deciem 's website)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(ordering, is online difficult)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(ordering, is online bad idea)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is online difficult)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(ordering, is online goddamn difficult)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is online goddamn difficult)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is online bad idea)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(ordering, is online bad idea)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ordering, be online)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(ordering, be from deciem 's website like)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ordering, is online goddamn difficult)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(ordering, is online goddamn difficult)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is online)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(ordering, be from deciem 's website)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is online idea)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(ordering, be online better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(ordering, be online better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(ordering, be online better)