ordering: is online bad idea

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operation
Weight: 0.56
, function
Weight: 0.55
, process
Weight: 0.50
, step
Weight: 0.49
, duty
Weight: 0.48
Siblings printing
Weight: 0.30
, inventory
Weight: 0.30
, distribution
Weight: 0.30
, loading
Weight: 0.30
, operating system
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is online bad idea 1.00
is online idea 0.96
is bad idea 0.92
is idea 0.88
be online better 0.83
is online 0.83
be online 0.82
is online difficult 0.79
is online goddamn difficult 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(ordering, is online bad idea)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(ordering, is online idea)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(ordering, is online idea)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(ordering, is online idea)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(ordering, is bad idea)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(ordering, is idea)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ordering, is bad idea)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(ordering, is idea)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(ordering, is idea)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ordering, is bad idea)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(ordering, is online)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(ordering, be online)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(ordering, is online)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(ordering, be online)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(ordering, be online better)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(ordering, be online better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(ordering, be online better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(ordering, is online)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(ordering, be online)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(ordering, is online goddamn difficult)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(ordering, is online difficult)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(ordering, is online difficult)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ordering, is online goddamn difficult)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(ordering, is online goddamn difficult)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(ordering, is online difficult)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is bad idea)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is online goddamn difficult)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(ordering, be online better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is online difficult)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is online idea)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ordering, be online)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is online)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is idea)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is online bad idea)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(ordering, is online bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(ordering, is online bad idea)