ordering: is bad idea

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operation
Weight: 0.56
, function
Weight: 0.55
, process
Weight: 0.50
, step
Weight: 0.49
, duty
Weight: 0.48
Siblings printing
Weight: 0.30
, inventory
Weight: 0.30
, distribution
Weight: 0.30
, loading
Weight: 0.30
, operating system
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad idea 1.00
is idea 0.94
is online bad idea 0.92
is online idea 0.84
be done bad 0.80
call of is wwii bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ordering, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(ordering, is bad idea)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(ordering, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(ordering, is idea)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ordering, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(ordering, is idea)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(ordering, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(ordering, is idea)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(ordering, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(ordering, is online idea)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(ordering, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(ordering, is online bad idea)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(ordering, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(ordering, is online bad idea)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ordering, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(ordering, is online idea)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(ordering, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(ordering, is online idea)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(ordering, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(ordering, be done bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ordering, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(ordering, is online bad idea)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ordering, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(ordering, be done bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(ordering, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(ordering, be done bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(ordering, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(ordering, be done bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(ordering, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is online bad idea)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(ordering, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is idea)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(ordering, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is online idea)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(ordering, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ordering, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is bad idea)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ordering, is bad idea)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ordering, is bad idea)