ordering: be done bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operation
Weight: 0.56
, function
Weight: 0.55
, process
Weight: 0.50
, step
Weight: 0.49
, duty
Weight: 0.48
Siblings printing
Weight: 0.30
, inventory
Weight: 0.30
, distribution
Weight: 0.30
, loading
Weight: 0.30
, operating system
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be done bad 1.00
is done 0.94
is up done 0.90
is bad idea 0.80
be done stomach 0.79
has quality bad 0.79
be from hell good 0.76
call of is wwii bad 0.76
has quality good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(step, is up done)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(ordering, be done bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(step, is done)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(ordering, be done bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(step, be from hell good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(ordering, be done bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(operation, be done stomach)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(ordering, be done bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(operation, be done stomach)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(step, is done)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(step, is up done)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(step, be from hell good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(step, is done)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(step, is up done)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(operation, be done stomach)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(step, be from hell good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(printing, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(step, is up done)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(ordering, be done bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(step, is done)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(ordering, be done bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(step, be from hell good)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(ordering, be done bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(operation, be done stomach)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(ordering, be done bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(operating system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(operating system, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(inventory, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(inventory, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(printing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(printing, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(ordering, be done bad)

Similarity expansion

0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ordering, is bad idea)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is bad idea)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ordering, is bad idea)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(ordering, is bad idea)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(ordering, be done bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(ordering, be done bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(step, is done)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(step, is up done)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(operation, be done stomach)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(step, be from hell good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(printing, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(inventory, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(operating system, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(step, is done)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(operation, be done stomach)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(step, is up done)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(ordering, be done bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(step, be from hell good)