ordering: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operation
Weight: 0.56
, function
Weight: 0.55
, process
Weight: 0.50
, step
Weight: 0.49
, duty
Weight: 0.48
Siblings printing
Weight: 0.30
, inventory
Weight: 0.30
, distribution
Weight: 0.30
, loading
Weight: 0.30
, operating system
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is cheaper 0.85
is free cheaper 0.81
is cheap 0.79
is complicated 0.78
has quality cost 0.77
is damn complicated 0.76
is inefficient 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(step, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ordering, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(process, is inefficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ordering, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(duty, is free cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ordering, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(step, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(duty, is free cheaper)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(process, is inefficient)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(duty, is free cheaper)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(step, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(process, is inefficient)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(printing, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(operating system, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(step, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(ordering, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(process, is inefficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(ordering, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(duty, is free cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(ordering, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(operating system, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(operating system, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(printing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(printing, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(inventory, has quality cost)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(ordering, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(ordering, is complicated)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(ordering, is complicated)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(ordering, is damn complicated)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(ordering, is complicated)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ordering, is damn complicated)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(ordering, is damn complicated)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is damn complicated)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is complicated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ordering, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(duty, is free cheaper)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(step, is expensive)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(process, is inefficient)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(inventory, has quality cost)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(operating system, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(printing, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(step, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(duty, is free cheaper)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ordering, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(process, is inefficient)