inventory: has quality cost

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents document
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.60
, detail
Weight: 0.60
, operation
Weight: 0.59
, line item
Weight: 0.58
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.32
, documentation
Weight: 0.32
, distribution
Weight: 0.32
, supply
Weight: 0.32
, operating system
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality cost 1.00
has quality good 0.82
be equal to cost 0.82
is marginal cost 0.82
has quality bad 0.81
cost much more in america 0.79
carrying cost 0.79
be equal to marginal cost 0.78
was for minning expensive 0.78
affect price of product 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(inventory, has quality cost)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(operation, cost much more in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(inventory, has quality cost)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(operation, cost much more in america)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(line item, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(line item, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(operation, cost much more in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(supply, is marginal cost)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(supply, be equal to marginal cost)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(supply, be equal to cost)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(supply, was for minning expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(supply, has quality cost)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(supply, affect price of product)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(inventory, has quality cost)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(operation, cost much more in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(inventory, has quality cost)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(supply, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(supply, has quality cost)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(operating system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(operating system, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(supply, affect price of product) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(supply, affect price of product)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(supply, be equal to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(supply, be equal to cost)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(supply, be equal to marginal cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(supply, be equal to marginal cost)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(supply, was for minning expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(supply, was for minning expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(supply, is marginal cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(supply, is marginal cost)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(inventory, has quality cost)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(inventory, carrying cost)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(inventory, carrying cost)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(inventory, carrying cost)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(inventory, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(inventory, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(inventory, carrying cost)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(inventory, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(inventory, has quality cost)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(operation, cost much more in america)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(line item, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(supply, affect price of product)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(supply, has quality cost)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(supply, be equal to marginal cost)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(supply, is marginal cost)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(operating system, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(supply, be equal to cost)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(supply, was for minning expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(operation, cost much more in america)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(line item, has quality good)