line item: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.79
, detail
Weight: 0.62
, appropriation
Weight: 0.62
, entry
Weight: 0.58
Siblings inventory
Weight: 0.58
, shoe box
Weight: 0.35
, shopping bag
Weight: 0.35
, canned goods
Weight: 0.35
, movie ticket
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality worth 0.85
has quality system 0.84
has quality cost 0.82
has quality evil 0.78
be bad for environment 0.77
has quality asset 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(line item, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(entry, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(line item, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(appropriation, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(entry, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(appropriation, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(entry, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(canned goods, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(shopping bag, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(canned goods, has quality worth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality evil)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(inventory, has quality asset)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(movie ticket, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(line item, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(entry, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(line item, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(canned goods, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(canned goods, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(inventory, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(inventory, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(movie ticket, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(movie ticket, has quality worth)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(canned goods, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(canned goods, has quality worth)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(inventory, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(inventory, has quality cost)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(shopping bag, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(shopping bag, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(inventory, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(inventory, has quality asset)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(inventory, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(inventory, has quality evil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(line item, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(line item, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(line item, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(appropriation, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(entry, has quality system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(movie ticket, has quality worth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(canned goods, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(shopping bag, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(inventory, has quality asset)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(inventory, has quality cost)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(canned goods, has quality worth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(inventory, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(inventory, has quality evil)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(appropriation, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(line item, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(entry, has quality system)