appropriation: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	legislation Weight: 0.65 , issue Weight: 0.61 , amount Weight: 0.59 , activity Weight: 0.56
Siblings	line item Weight: 0.62 , proposal Weight: 0.33 , authorization Weight: 0.33 , spending Weight: 0.32 , reimbursement Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
has quality bad	0.96
has quality worth	0.85
feel good	0.80
affect water quality	0.79
is good thing	0.78
has quality evil	0.78
has quality questions	0.76
improve performance	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(legislation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(appropriation, has quality good)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(legislation, has quality evil) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(appropriation, has quality good)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(legislation, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(appropriation, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(legislation, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(legislation, has quality questions)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(legislation, has quality evil)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(legislation, has quality evil)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(legislation, has quality good)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(legislation, has quality questions)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, has quality bad)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(spending, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(line item, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(spending, feel good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(spending, is good thing)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(spending, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(legislation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(appropriation, has quality good)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(legislation, has quality evil) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(appropriation, has quality good)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(legislation, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(appropriation, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(reimbursement, has quality good)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(line item, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(line item, has quality good)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(spending, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(spending, has quality bad)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(reimbursement, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(reimbursement, has quality bad)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(spending, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(spending, has quality worth)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(spending, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(spending, feel good)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(spending, is good thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(spending, is good thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(appropriation, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(appropriation, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(appropriation, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(legislation, has quality good)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(legislation, has quality questions)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(legislation, has quality evil)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(spending, has quality worth)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(spending, is good thing)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(spending, has quality bad)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(spending, feel good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(reimbursement, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(reimbursement, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(line item, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(legislation, has quality good)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(legislation, has quality questions)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(appropriation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(legislation, has quality evil)