spending: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.66
, bill
Weight: 0.58
, behavior
Weight: 0.58
, policy
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.57
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.35
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.34
, dollar bill
Weight: 0.33
, consumption
Weight: 0.33
, appropriation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality bad 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(spending, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(spending, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(spending, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(spending, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(spending, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(spending, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(spending, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(spending, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(spending, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(spending, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(spending, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(spending, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(spending, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(spending, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(spending, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(spending, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(spending, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(spending, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(spending, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(spending, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(spending, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(spending, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(spending, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(spending, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(spending, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)