oregon: has state wild

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents region
Weight: 0.59
, program
Weight: 0.59
, california
Weight: 0.57
, state
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
Siblings san jose
Weight: 0.60
, florida
Weight: 0.35
, arkansas
Weight: 0.34
, alaska
Weight: 0.34
, missouri
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state wild 1.00
has state state 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(california, has state state)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(oregon, has state wild)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(oregon, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(california, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(oregon, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(california, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(oregon, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(oregon, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(alaska, has state state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(oregon, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, has state state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(oregon, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(florida, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(california, has state state)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(oregon, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(oregon, has state wild)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(oregon, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(florida, has state state)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(florida, has state state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(oregon, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(arkansas, has state state)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(arkansas, has state state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(oregon, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(missouri, has state state)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, has state state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(oregon, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(alaska, has state state)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(alaska, has state state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(oregon, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(oregon, has state wild)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(oregon, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(oregon, has state state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(oregon, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(oregon, has state state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(oregon, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(oregon, has state state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(oregon, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(oregon, has state state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(oregon, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(oregon, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(oregon, has state wild)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(oregon, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(oregon, has state wild)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(oregon, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(california, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(oregon, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(arkansas, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(oregon, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(florida, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(oregon, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(missouri, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(oregon, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(alaska, has state state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(oregon, has state wild)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(california, has state state)