orientation: be important to employees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.64
, activity
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, variable
Weight: 0.61
, parameter
Weight: 0.60
Siblings socialization
Weight: 0.33
, business activity
Weight: 0.33
, alignment
Weight: 0.33
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.33
, camp
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to employees 1.00
be important in workplace 0.78
be important at work 0.77
be important for individuals 0.77
be important in business 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(orientation, be important to employees)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(orientation, be important to employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(orientation, be important to employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(orientation, be important to employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(alignment, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(orientation, be important to employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(socialization, be important at work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(orientation, be important to employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(socialization, be important in workplace)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(orientation, be important to employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(socialization, be important for individuals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(orientation, be important to employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(orientation, be important to employees)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(orientation, be important to employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(socialization, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(socialization, be important in workplace)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(orientation, be important to employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(socialization, be important for individuals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(socialization, be important for individuals)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(orientation, be important to employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(socialization, be important at work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(socialization, be important at work)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(orientation, be important to employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(alignment, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(alignment, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(orientation, be important to employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(orientation, be important to employees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(orientation, be important to employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(orientation, be important to employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(orientation, be important to employees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(orientation, be important to employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(orientation, be important to employees)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(orientation, be important to employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(orientation, be important to employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(socialization, be important in workplace)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(orientation, be important to employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(socialization, be important for individuals)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(orientation, be important to employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(socialization, be important at work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(orientation, be important to employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(alignment, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(orientation, be important to employees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)