orientation: is hrm activity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.64
, activity
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, variable
Weight: 0.61
, parameter
Weight: 0.60
Siblings socialization
Weight: 0.33
, business activity
Weight: 0.33
, alignment
Weight: 0.33
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.33
, camp
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hrm activity 1.00
is important hrm activity 0.97
be among type of activity 0.88
be among beneficial type of activity 0.84
be among most beneficial type of activity 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(orientation, is hrm activity)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(orientation, is hrm activity)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(orientation, is hrm activity)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(orientation, is hrm activity)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(orientation, is hrm activity)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(orientation, is hrm activity)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(orientation, is hrm activity)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(orientation, is hrm activity)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(orientation, is important hrm activity)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(orientation, is hrm activity)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(orientation, is important hrm activity)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(orientation, is hrm activity)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(orientation, is important hrm activity)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(orientation, is hrm activity)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(orientation, is important hrm activity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(orientation, is hrm activity)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(orientation, is hrm activity)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(orientation, is hrm activity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(orientation, is hrm activity)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(orientation, is hrm activity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(orientation, is hrm activity)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(orientation, is hrm activity)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(activity, be among most beneficial type of activity)