osteoporosis: affect population

Related concepts

Parents	symptom Weight: 0.64 , complication Weight: 0.63 , disease Weight: 0.63 , illness Weight: 0.61 , menopause Weight: 0.59
Siblings	rheumatoid arthritis Weight: 0.72 , lyme disease Weight: 0.36 , atherosclerosis Weight: 0.36 , arthritis Weight: 0.36 , hypertension Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
affect population	1.00
affect female population	0.93
affect predominantly population	0.92
affect predominantly female population	0.89
persist in population	0.87
persist in human population	0.85
affect people	0.82
affect system	0.76
affect health	0.76
affect older people	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(disease, affect health) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(osteoporosis, affect population)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(disease, affect health)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(disease, affect health)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(arthritis, affect system)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(rheumatoid arthritis, affect system)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, affect system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(disease, affect health) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(osteoporosis, affect population)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(lyme disease, affect system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(lyme disease, affect system)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(rheumatoid arthritis, affect system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(rheumatoid arthritis, affect system)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(arthritis, affect system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(arthritis, affect system)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(osteoporosis, affect population)

Similarity expansion

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect female population)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect predominantly population)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect people)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.22

Typical(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(osteoporosis, affect predominantly population)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect older people)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(osteoporosis, affect predominantly population)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect system)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(osteoporosis, affect predominantly population)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(osteoporosis, affect female population)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(osteoporosis, affect people)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(osteoporosis, affect system)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(osteoporosis, affect older people)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(osteoporosis, affect system)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.22

Typical(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(osteoporosis, affect system)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(osteoporosis, affect people)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(osteoporosis, affect female population)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.22

Typical(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(osteoporosis, affect people)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(osteoporosis, affect older people)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.22

Typical(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(osteoporosis, affect predominantly female population)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.22

Typical(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(osteoporosis, affect female population)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.22

Typical(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(osteoporosis, affect older people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

Salient(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect population)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(osteoporosis, affect population)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(disease, affect health)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(lyme disease, affect system)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(rheumatoid arthritis, affect system)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(arthritis, affect system)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.22

Typical(osteoporosis, affect population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(disease, affect health)