oven: be better than gas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents household appliance
Weight: 0.60
, device
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.56
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.56
Siblings microwave oven
Weight: 0.73
, refrigerator
Weight: 0.36
, frying pan
Weight: 0.36
, fridge
Weight: 0.35
, stove
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than gas 1.00
be cheaper online than than store 0.77
be better than microwave 0.75
is more efficient now 0.75
make last longer food 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(item, be cheaper online than than store)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(oven, be better than gas)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(oven, be better than gas)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(item, be cheaper online than than store)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(oven, be better than gas)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(item, be cheaper online than than store)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(oven, be better than gas)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(stove, be better than gas)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(oven, be better than gas)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(refrigerator, make last longer food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(item, be cheaper online than than store)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(oven, be better than gas)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(oven, be better than gas)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(oven, be better than gas)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(stove, be better than gas)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(stove, be better than gas)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(oven, be better than gas)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(refrigerator, make last longer food)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(refrigerator, make last longer food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(oven, be better than gas)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(oven, be better than gas)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(oven, be better than gas)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(oven, be better than microwave)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(oven, be better than gas)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(oven, be better than microwave)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(oven, be better than gas)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(oven, be better than microwave)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(oven, be better than gas)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(oven, be better than microwave)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(oven, be better than gas)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(oven, be better than gas)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(oven, be better than gas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(oven, be better than gas)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(oven, be better than gas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(oven, be better than gas)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(item, be cheaper online than than store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(oven, be better than gas)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(stove, be better than gas)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(oven, be better than gas)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(refrigerator, make last longer food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(oven, be better than gas)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(item, be cheaper online than than store)