oven: is cleaner dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents household appliance
Weight: 0.60
, device
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.56
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.56
Siblings microwave oven
Weight: 0.73
, refrigerator
Weight: 0.36
, frying pan
Weight: 0.36
, fridge
Weight: 0.35
, stove
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is cleaner dangerous 1.00
is dangerous 0.80
is clean 0.79
get dirty 0.77
is more efficient 0.76
is more efficient now 0.75
is dry clean 0.75
is efficient 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(oven, is cleaner dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, is dangerous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(oven, is cleaner dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(fridge, is more efficient)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(oven, is cleaner dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(fridge, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(fridge, is more efficient)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(oven, is cleaner dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(microwave oven, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(microwave oven, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(oven, is cleaner dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(oven, is cleaner dangerous)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(oven, is cleaner dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(oven, get dirty)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(oven, is cleaner dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(oven, get dirty)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(oven, is cleaner dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(oven, get dirty)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(oven, is cleaner dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(oven, get dirty)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(oven, is cleaner dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(oven, is cleaner dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(oven, is cleaner dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(oven, is cleaner dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(oven, is cleaner dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(oven, is cleaner dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(microwave oven, is dangerous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(oven, is cleaner dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fridge, is more efficient)