overpopulation: contribute to warming

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.66
, crisis
Weight: 0.65
, problem
Weight: 0.65
, topic
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.35
, inequality
Weight: 0.34
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
contribute to warming 1.00
contribute to global warming 0.94
affect warming 0.92
cause warming 0.91
affect global warming 0.88
cause global warming 0.87
be caused by warming 0.85
be caused by global warming 0.83
contribute to pollution 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(desertification, affect global warming)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(desertification, be caused by global warming)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(desertification, be caused by warming)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(desertification, affect warming)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(desertification, affect warming)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(desertification, affect warming)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(desertification, be caused by warming)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(desertification, be caused by warming)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(desertification, affect global warming)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(desertification, affect global warming)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(desertification, be caused by global warming)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(desertification, be caused by global warming)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(overpopulation, contribute to warming)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to global warming)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, cause warming)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, cause global warming)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(overpopulation, contribute to global warming)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, contribute to global warming)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(overpopulation, cause global warming)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, cause global warming)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(overpopulation, cause warming)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, cause warming)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(overpopulation, contribute to global warming)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(overpopulation, cause global warming)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(overpopulation, cause warming)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to warming)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(overpopulation, contribute to warming)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(desertification, affect warming)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(desertification, affect global warming)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(desertification, be caused by warming)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to warming)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(desertification, be caused by global warming)