owl: have sharp talons

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.76
, predator
Weight: 0.71
, creature
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.68
Siblings barn owl
Weight: 0.79
, snowy owl
Weight: 0.75
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.41
, great horned owl
Weight: 0.41
, falcon
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
have sharp talons 1.00
need sharp talons 0.99
use talons 0.95
need talons 0.94
has physical part talons 0.94
have sharp claws 0.91
have big claws 0.85
have serrated claws 0.84
has physical part claws 0.83
have strong beak 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(owl, have sharp talons)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(falcon, has physical part claws)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(owl, have sharp talons)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(falcon, has physical part claws)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(falcon, has physical part claws)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(owl, have sharp talons)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(owl, have sharp talons)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(owl, have sharp talons)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(owl, has physical part talons)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(owl, have sharp talons)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(owl, has physical part talons)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(owl, have sharp talons)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(owl, has physical part talons)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(owl, have sharp talons)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(owl, has physical part talons)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(owl, have sharp talons)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(owl, have sharp talons)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(owl, have sharp talons)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(owl, have sharp talons)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(owl, have sharp talons)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(owl, have sharp talons)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(falcon, has physical part claws)