owl: has physical part talons

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.76
, predator
Weight: 0.71
, creature
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.68
Siblings barn owl
Weight: 0.79
, snowy owl
Weight: 0.75
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.41
, great horned owl
Weight: 0.41
, falcon
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part talons 1.00
need talons 0.96
use talons 0.96
have sharp talons 0.94
need sharp talons 0.93
has physical part claws 0.89
has physical part beaks 0.86
has physical part beak 0.85
have big claws 0.82
have serrated claws 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(owl, has physical part talons)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(owl, has physical part talons)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(owl, has physical part talons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(owl, has physical part talons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part beak)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(owl, has physical part talons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beaks)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(owl, has physical part talons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beak)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(owl, has physical part talons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(falcon, has physical part claws)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(owl, has physical part talons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(owl, has physical part talons)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(owl, has physical part talons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(owl, has physical part talons)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(owl, has physical part talons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(falcon, has physical part claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(falcon, has physical part claws)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(owl, has physical part talons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(owl, has physical part talons)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(owl, has physical part talons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(owl, has physical part beak)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(owl, has physical part talons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(owl, has physical part beak)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(owl, has physical part talons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(owl, have sharp talons)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(owl, has physical part talons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(owl, has physical part beak)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(owl, has physical part talons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(owl, has physical part beak)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(owl, has physical part talons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(owl, have sharp talons)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(owl, has physical part talons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(owl, have sharp talons)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(owl, has physical part talons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(owl, have sharp talons)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(owl, has physical part talons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(owl, has physical part talons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(owl, has physical part talons)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(owl, has physical part talons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(owl, has physical part talons)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(owl, has physical part talons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(owl, has physical part talons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beak)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(owl, has physical part talons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(falcon, has physical part claws)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(owl, has physical part talons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(owl, has physical part talons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beak)