bird: has physical part beak

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dead bird
Weight: 0.67
, chicken
Weight: 0.66
, wildlife
Weight: 0.65
, hobby
Weight: 0.65
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.85
, wren
Weight: 0.77
, heron
Weight: 0.77
, owl
Weight: 0.76
, great horned owl
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part beak 1.00
has beak 0.96
have sharp beak 0.92
be with different beak types 0.90
has physical part beaks 0.88
has physical part talons 0.85
have long beaks 0.82
have beaks of shapes 0.81
have different beaks 0.81
need beaks 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(chicken, has beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beak)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(chicken, has beak)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(chicken, has beak)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(owl, has physical part beak)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(owl, has physical part talons)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(heron, has physical part beak)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(heron, has physical part beaks)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(heron, have sharp beak)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(heron, have long beaks)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(chicken, has beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part beak)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(heron, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(heron, has physical part beak)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(owl, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(owl, has physical part beak)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(heron, have sharp beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(heron, have sharp beak)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(heron, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(heron, has physical part beaks)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(owl, has physical part talons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(owl, has physical part talons)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(heron, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(heron, have long beaks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(bird, has physical part beak)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(bird, has beak)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(bird, has beak)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(bird, has physical part beaks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beaks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bird, has beak)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(bird, has beak)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beak)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beak)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(chicken, has beak)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(heron, has physical part beak)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(heron, has physical part beaks)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(owl, has physical part beak)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(owl, has physical part talons)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(heron, have sharp beak)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(heron, have long beaks)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(chicken, has beak)