oyster: taste bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents seafood
Weight: 0.66
, mollusk
Weight: 0.66
, shellfish
Weight: 0.62
, crustacean
Weight: 0.54
, product
Weight: 0.53
Siblings shrimp
Weight: 0.38
, crab
Weight: 0.37
, lobster
Weight: 0.36
, scallop
Weight: 0.36
, mussel
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste bad 1.00
taste good 0.97
taste bitter 0.87
have metallic taste 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(crustacean, taste good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(oyster, taste bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(oyster, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(crustacean, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(oyster, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(crustacean, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(oyster, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mussel, taste bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(oyster, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(scallop, taste good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(oyster, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(scallop, taste bitter)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(crustacean, taste good)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(oyster, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(oyster, taste bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(oyster, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(scallop, taste bitter)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(scallop, taste bitter)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(oyster, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(scallop, taste good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(scallop, taste good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(oyster, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(mussel, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(mussel, taste bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(oyster, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(oyster, taste bad)

Similarity expansion

0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(oyster, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(oyster, taste good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(oyster, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(oyster, taste good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(oyster, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(oyster, taste good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(oyster, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(oyster, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(oyster, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(oyster, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(oyster, taste bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(oyster, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(oyster, taste bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(oyster, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(crustacean, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(oyster, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mussel, taste bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(oyster, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(scallop, taste good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(oyster, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(scallop, taste bitter)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(oyster, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(crustacean, taste good)