scallop: taste good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.63
, dish
Weight: 0.61
, seafood
Weight: 0.60
, mollusk
Weight: 0.59
, shellfish
Weight: 0.58
Siblings lobster
Weight: 0.37
, crab
Weight: 0.37
, chinook salmon
Weight: 0.37
, shrimp
Weight: 0.37
, atlantic salmon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste good 1.00
taste sweet 0.90
taste bitter 0.85
taste fishy 0.82
taste gritty 0.82
has quality good 0.79
taste metallic 0.78
taste like iodine 0.78
taste like ammonia 0.78
has sweetness sweet 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(seafood, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(scallop, taste good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(species, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(scallop, taste good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(seafood, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(scallop, taste good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(seafood, has sweetness sweet)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(species, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(seafood, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(seafood, has sweetness sweet)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(seafood, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(species, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, taste like iodine)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(seafood, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(scallop, taste good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(species, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(scallop, taste good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(seafood, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(scallop, taste good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(shrimp, taste like iodine) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(shrimp, taste like iodine)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(shrimp, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(shrimp, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(scallop, taste good)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(scallop, taste bitter)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(scallop, taste bitter)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(scallop, taste bitter)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(scallop, taste sweet)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(scallop, taste bitter)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(scallop, taste fishy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(scallop, taste gritty)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(scallop, taste sweet)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(scallop, taste metallic)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(scallop, taste like iodine)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(scallop, taste metallic)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(scallop, taste like ammonia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(scallop, taste like iodine)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(scallop, taste like ammonia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(scallop, taste sweet)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(scallop, taste fishy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(scallop, taste metallic)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(scallop, taste like iodine)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(scallop, taste fishy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(scallop, taste gritty)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(scallop, taste like ammonia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(scallop, taste gritty)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(scallop, taste metallic)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(scallop, taste fishy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(scallop, taste like iodine)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(scallop, taste like ammonia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(scallop, taste gritty)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(scallop, has sweetness sweet)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(scallop, taste sweet)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(scallop, has sweetness sweet)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(scallop, has sweetness sweet)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(scallop, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(scallop, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(scallop, has sweetness sweet)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(scallop, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(scallop, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(scallop, taste good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(scallop, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(seafood, has sweetness sweet)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(species, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(seafood, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(shrimp, taste like iodine)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(shrimp, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(seafood, has sweetness sweet)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(species, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(scallop, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(seafood, has quality good)