scallop: taste metallic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.63
, dish
Weight: 0.61
, seafood
Weight: 0.60
, mollusk
Weight: 0.59
, shellfish
Weight: 0.58
Siblings lobster
Weight: 0.37
, crab
Weight: 0.37
, chinook salmon
Weight: 0.37
, shrimp
Weight: 0.37
, atlantic salmon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste metallic 1.00
taste sweet 0.80
taste good 0.78
taste like ammonia 0.76
taste like iodine 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(scallop, taste metallic)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, taste like iodine)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(scallop, taste metallic)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(shrimp, taste like iodine)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(shrimp, taste like iodine)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(scallop, taste metallic)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(scallop, taste metallic)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(scallop, taste metallic)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(scallop, taste like iodine)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(scallop, taste metallic)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(scallop, taste like ammonia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(scallop, taste metallic)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(scallop, taste like iodine)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(scallop, taste metallic)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(scallop, taste like iodine)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(scallop, taste metallic)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(scallop, taste like ammonia)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(scallop, taste metallic)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(scallop, taste like ammonia)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(scallop, taste metallic)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(scallop, taste like iodine)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(scallop, taste metallic)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(scallop, taste like ammonia)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(scallop, taste metallic)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(scallop, taste sweet)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(scallop, taste metallic)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(scallop, taste good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(scallop, taste metallic)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(scallop, taste good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(scallop, taste metallic)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(scallop, taste sweet)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(scallop, taste metallic)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(scallop, taste sweet)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(scallop, taste metallic)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(scallop, taste good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(scallop, taste metallic)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(scallop, taste sweet)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(scallop, taste metallic)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(scallop, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(scallop, taste metallic)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(scallop, taste metallic)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(scallop, taste metallic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(scallop, taste metallic)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(scallop, taste metallic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(scallop, taste metallic)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(shrimp, taste like iodine)