pacemaker: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.68
, device
Weight: 0.65
, condition
Weight: 0.60
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.58
, defibrillator
Weight: 0.57
Siblings implant
Weight: 0.36
, artificial heart
Weight: 0.35
, network device
Weight: 0.35
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.35
, stent
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is good thing 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pacemaker, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pacemaker, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(plastic surgery, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(implant, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(implant, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(stent, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(plastic surgery, is good thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pacemaker, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pacemaker, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(stent, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(stent, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(network device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(implant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(implant, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(plastic surgery, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(plastic surgery, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(implant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(implant, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(network device, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(plastic surgery, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(plastic surgery, is good thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(pacemaker, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pacemaker, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pacemaker, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(network device, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(plastic surgery, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(implant, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(network device, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(implant, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(stent, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(plastic surgery, is good thing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(pacemaker, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)