pal: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organization
Weight: 0.55
, system
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, option
Weight: 0.50
, child
Weight: 0.46
Siblings girl scout
Weight: 0.32
, big brother
Weight: 0.32
, roommate
Weight: 0.31
, lover
Weight: 0.31
, family member
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
is good for 0.86
has quality rewards 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(pal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(big brother, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(pal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(lover, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(pal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(lover, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(lover, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(pal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(big brother, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(big brother, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(pal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(pal, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(pal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(pal, is good for)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(pal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pal, is good for)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(pal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(pal, is good for)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(pal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(pal, has quality rewards)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(pal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(pal, is good for)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(pal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pal, has quality rewards)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(pal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(pal, has quality rewards)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(pal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(pal, has quality rewards)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(pal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(pal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(pal, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(pal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(pal, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(pal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(lover, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(pal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(big brother, has quality good)