pan: fry unhealthy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cooking utensil
Weight: 0.65
, parameter
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.57
, tool
Weight: 0.56
Siblings frying pan
Weight: 0.80
, wok
Weight: 0.56
, skillet
Weight: 0.53
, baking sheet
Weight: 0.49
, saucepan
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
fry unhealthy 1.00
fry healthy 0.94
be better than frying pan 0.80
fried around bacon jump 0.78
be fried noodles 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(pan, fry unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(wok, be better than frying pan)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pan, fry unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(wok, be better than frying pan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(wok, be better than frying pan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pan, fry unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(pan, fry unhealthy)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(pan, fry unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(pan, fry healthy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pan, fry unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(pan, fry healthy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(pan, fry unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(pan, fry healthy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(pan, fry unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(pan, fry healthy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(pan, fry unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(pan, be fried noodles)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(pan, fry unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(pan, be fried noodles)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(pan, fry unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(pan, be fried noodles)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pan, fry unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(pan, be fried noodles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(pan, fry unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(pan, fry unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(pan, fry unhealthy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pan, fry unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(pan, fry unhealthy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(pan, fry unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(wok, be better than frying pan)