panda: is endangered

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.71
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, wild animal
Weight: 0.59
, bear
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings panda bear
Weight: 0.41
, giant panda
Weight: 0.40
, red panda
Weight: 0.40
, orangutan
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is endangered 1.00
be endangered 2018 1.00
be endangered 1.00
be endangered ks2 1.00
be in endangered 0.99
get endangered 0.97
go endangered 0.96
be considered endangered 0.95
become endangered 0.94
being endangered 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(bear, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(panda, is endangered)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, become endangered)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(panda, is endangered)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(bear, is endangered)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, become endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bear, is endangered)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, become endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be endangered 2018)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, is endangered)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be endangered ks2)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be endangered)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, become endangered)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(bear, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(panda, is endangered)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, become endangered)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(panda, is endangered)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(red panda, be in endangered)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(red panda, be in endangered)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(giant panda, be endangered 2018)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be endangered 2018)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(giant panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(giant panda, is endangered)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(giant panda, become endangered)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(giant panda, become endangered)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(giant panda, be endangered ks2)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be endangered ks2)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(panda, is endangered)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(panda, get endangered)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(panda, get endangered)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(panda, get endangered)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(panda, be in endangered)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(panda, get endangered)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(panda, is endangered)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(panda, is endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bear, is endangered)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, become endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(giant panda, be endangered 2018)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(giant panda, is endangered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(giant panda, be endangered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(giant panda, be endangered ks2)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(giant panda, become endangered)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bear, is endangered)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, become endangered)