giant panda: be considered endangered

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.66
, mammal
Weight: 0.62
, bear
Weight: 0.60
Siblings red panda
Weight: 0.80
, panda
Weight: 0.40
, panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, orangutan
Weight: 0.37
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered endangered 1.00
be endangered 2018 0.95
be endangered 0.95
be endangered ks2 0.95
is endangered 0.95
become endangered 0.93
be are endangered 0.92
is are endangered 0.92
being endangered 0.91
is endangered species 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, become endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(giant panda, be considered endangered)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(bear, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(giant panda, be considered endangered)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(species, be endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(giant panda, be considered endangered)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bear, is endangered species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(giant panda, be considered endangered)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(giant panda, be considered endangered)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, become endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(giant panda, be considered endangered)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(species, is endangered)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(species, become endangered)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(species, be endangered)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(bear, is endangered species)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(bear, is endangered)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, become endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(species, be endangered)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, is endangered)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(species, become endangered)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bear, is endangered)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, become endangered)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(bear, is endangered species)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(spider monkey, be considered endangered)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(panda, is endangered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, is endangered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(panda, is are endangered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(orangutan, become endangered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(orangutan, is endangered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be endangered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is endangered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(spider monkey, is endangered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(red panda, become endangered)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is endangered species)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, is endangered species)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(orangutan, is endangered species)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(bear, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, become endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(species, be endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, become endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bear, is endangered species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(orangutan, is endangered species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(orangutan, is endangered species)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(panda bear, is endangered species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(panda bear, is endangered species)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(red panda, is endangered species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(red panda, is endangered species)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(spider monkey, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(spider monkey, is endangered)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(red panda, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(red panda, is endangered)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(red panda, be endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(red panda, be endangered)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(red panda, become endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(red panda, become endangered)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(orangutan, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(orangutan, is endangered)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(spider monkey, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(spider monkey, be considered endangered)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(panda bear, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(panda bear, is endangered)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(panda, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(panda, is endangered)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(orangutan, become endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(orangutan, become endangered)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(panda, is are endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(panda, is are endangered)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(giant panda, be considered endangered)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be endangered 2018)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, become endangered)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(giant panda, become endangered)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be endangered 2018)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(giant panda, be endangered 2018)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(giant panda, become endangered)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be endangered ks2)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be endangered)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, is endangered)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(giant panda, be endangered ks2)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(giant panda, be endangered)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be are endangered)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(giant panda, is endangered)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(giant panda, be are endangered)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be endangered ks2)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be endangered)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(giant panda, is endangered)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, being endangered)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be are endangered)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(giant panda, become endangered)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(giant panda, be endangered 2018)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(giant panda, being endangered)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, is are endangered)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(giant panda, is endangered)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(giant panda, be endangered)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(giant panda, be endangered ks2)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(giant panda, is are endangered)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(giant panda, being endangered)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(giant panda, be are endangered)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(giant panda, being endangered)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(giant panda, is are endangered)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(giant panda, is are endangered)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(giant panda, is endangered species)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, is endangered species)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(giant panda, is endangered species)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(giant panda, is endangered species)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(giant panda, be considered endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, is endangered)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(species, be endangered)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(species, become endangered)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bear, is endangered)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, become endangered)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(bear, is endangered species)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(spider monkey, be considered endangered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(panda, is endangered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(red panda, be endangered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(red panda, is endangered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(panda bear, is endangered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(spider monkey, is endangered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(orangutan, is endangered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(red panda, become endangered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(panda bear, is endangered species)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(panda, is are endangered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(orangutan, is endangered species)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(orangutan, become endangered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(red panda, is endangered species)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, is endangered)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(species, be endangered)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(species, become endangered)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(bear, is endangered species)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bear, is endangered)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(giant panda, be considered endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, become endangered)