paper towel: has quality uses

Related concepts

Parents	material Weight: 0.69 , restroom Weight: 0.66 , paper Weight: 0.62 , towel Weight: 0.61
Siblings	toilet paper Weight: 0.71 , tissue Weight: 0.56 , bounty Weight: 0.50 , beach towel Weight: 0.40 , white paper Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality uses	1.00
has quality good	0.78
has quality bad	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(towel, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(paper towel, has quality uses)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(paper, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(paper towel, has quality uses)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(paper, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(paper towel, has quality uses)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(paper, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(paper, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(towel, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(paper, has quality bad)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(paper, has quality good)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(towel, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(toilet paper, has quality bad)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(tissue, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(towel, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(paper towel, has quality uses)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(paper, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(paper towel, has quality uses)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(paper, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(paper towel, has quality uses)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(tissue, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(tissue, has quality good)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(toilet paper, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(toilet paper, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(paper towel, has quality uses)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Salient(paper towel, has quality bad)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(paper towel, has quality bad)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, has quality bad)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(paper towel, has quality good)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(paper towel, has quality bad)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(paper towel, has quality good)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, has quality good)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(paper towel, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, has quality uses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(paper towel, has quality uses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(paper, has quality bad)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(towel, has quality good)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(paper, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(toilet paper, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(tissue, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(paper, has quality bad)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(towel, has quality good)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(paper towel, has quality uses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(paper, has quality good)