parent: is protective

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sister
Weight: 0.66
, loser
Weight: 0.64
, worker
Weight: 0.63
, child
Weight: 0.62
Siblings neighbor
Weight: 0.62
, mom
Weight: 0.35
, mother
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is protective 1.00
be over protective 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(parent, is protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(mom, be over protective)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(parent, is protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mother, is protective)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(parent, is protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(mother, is protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(mother, is protective)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(parent, is protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(mom, be over protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(mom, be over protective)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(parent, is protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(parent, is protective)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(parent, is protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(parent, be over protective)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(parent, is protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(parent, be over protective)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(parent, is protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(parent, be over protective)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(parent, is protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(parent, be over protective)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(parent, is protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(parent, is protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(parent, is protective)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(parent, is protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(parent, is protective)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(parent, is protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mother, is protective)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(parent, is protective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mom, be over protective)