park ranger: be at state park

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at state park 1.00
be at park 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(park ranger, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(park ranger, be at state park)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(park ranger, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(park ranger, be at park)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(park ranger, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(park ranger, be at park)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(park ranger, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(park ranger, be at park)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(park ranger, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(park ranger, be at park)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(park ranger, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(park ranger, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(park ranger, be at state park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(park ranger, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(park ranger, be at state park)