park: was made

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents location
Weight: 0.67
, playground
Weight: 0.67
, site
Weight: 0.66
, attraction
Weight: 0.66
, property
Weight: 0.63
Siblings central park
Weight: 0.89
, yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.80
, death valley
Weight: 0.68
, joshua tree
Weight: 0.67
, walt disney world
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
was made 1.00
is made 0.96
be made 0.95
were made 0.93
was formd 0.86
be like dota2lounge made 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(site, be made)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(park, was made)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(park, was made)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(site, be made)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(park, was made)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(site, be made)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(park, was made)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(central park, was made)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(park, was made)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(death valley, was formd)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(site, be made)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(park, was made)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(park, was made)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(park, was made)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(central park, was made)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(central park, was made)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(park, was made)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(death valley, was formd)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(death valley, was formd)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(park, was made)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(park, was made)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(park, was made)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(park, were made)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(park, was made)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(park, is made)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(park, was made)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(park, were made)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(park, was made)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(park, were made)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(park, was made)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(park, were made)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(park, was made)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(park, is made)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(park, was made)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(park, is made)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(park, was made)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(park, is made)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(park, was made)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(park, was made)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(park, was made)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(park, was made)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(park, was made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(park, was made)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(site, be made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(park, was made)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(death valley, was formd)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(park, was made)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(central park, was made)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(park, was made)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(site, be made)