parking: affect business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parking zone
Weight: 0.64
, space
Weight: 0.64
, place
Weight: 0.60
, facility
Weight: 0.59
Siblings parking lot
Weight: 0.68
, garage
Weight: 0.63
, parking structure
Weight: 0.37
, international space station
Weight: 0.34
, sidewalk
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect business 1.00
affects business 0.90
be to business 0.90
affect communication 0.77
affect body 0.76
affect design 0.76
affect human health 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(space, affect design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(parking, affect business)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(space, affect communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(parking, affect business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(parking, affect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(space, affect communication)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(parking, affect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(space, affect design)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(parking, affect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(space, affect communication)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(parking, affect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(space, affect design)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(space, affect communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(parking, affect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(parking, affect business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(space, affect design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(parking, affect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(parking, affect business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(parking, affect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(parking, affect business)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(parking, affect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(parking, affects business)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(parking, affect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(parking, affects business)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(parking, affect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(parking, affects business)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(parking, affect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(parking, be to business)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(parking, affect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(parking, be to business)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(parking, affect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(parking, be to business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(parking, affect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(parking, affects business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(parking, affect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(parking, be to business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(parking, affect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(parking, affect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(parking, affect business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(parking, affect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(parking, affect business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(parking, affect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(space, affect communication)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(parking, affect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(space, affect design)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(parking, affect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(space, affect communication)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(parking, affect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(space, affect design)