parsnip: be more expensive than carrots

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crop
Weight: 0.61
, vegetable
Weight: 0.60
, root
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, winter
Weight: 0.49
Siblings tomato sauce
Weight: 0.37
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.36
, radish
Weight: 0.36
, parsley
Weight: 0.36
, kale
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than carrots 1.00
be better than potatoes 0.84
be better than potato 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(parsnip, be more expensive than carrots)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cauliflower, be better than potatoes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(parsnip, be more expensive than carrots)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(cauliflower, be better than potatoes)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(cauliflower, be better than potatoes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(parsnip, be more expensive than carrots)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(parsnip, be more expensive than carrots)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(parsnip, be more expensive than carrots)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(parsnip, be better than potatoes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(parsnip, be more expensive than carrots)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(parsnip, be better than potato)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(parsnip, be more expensive than carrots)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(parsnip, be better than potato)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(parsnip, be more expensive than carrots)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(parsnip, be better than potato)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(parsnip, be more expensive than carrots)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(parsnip, be better than potato)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(parsnip, be more expensive than carrots)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(parsnip, be better than potatoes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(parsnip, be more expensive than carrots)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(parsnip, be better than potatoes)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(parsnip, be more expensive than carrots)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(parsnip, be better than potatoes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(parsnip, be more expensive than carrots)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(parsnip, be more expensive than carrots)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(parsnip, be more expensive than carrots)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(parsnip, be more expensive than carrots)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(parsnip, be more expensive than carrots)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(parsnip, be more expensive than carrots)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cauliflower, be better than potatoes)