parthenogenesis: has quality advantage

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.44
, animal
Weight: 0.42
, reproduction
Weight: 0.30
, insect
Weight: 0.21
Siblings meiosis
Weight: 0.30
, photosynthesis
Weight: 0.30
, speciation
Weight: 0.30
, phagocytosis
Weight: 0.30
, cougar
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality advantage 1.00
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(insect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(parthenogenesis, has quality advantage)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(parthenogenesis, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(insect, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(parthenogenesis, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(insect, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(parthenogenesis, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(parthenogenesis, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cougar, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(insect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(parthenogenesis, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(parthenogenesis, has quality advantage)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(parthenogenesis, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(phagocytosis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(phagocytosis, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(parthenogenesis, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(cougar, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(cougar, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(parthenogenesis, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(parthenogenesis, has quality advantage)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(parthenogenesis, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(parthenogenesis, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(parthenogenesis, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(parthenogenesis, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(parthenogenesis, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(parthenogenesis, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(parthenogenesis, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(parthenogenesis, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(parthenogenesis, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(parthenogenesis, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(parthenogenesis, has quality advantage)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(parthenogenesis, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(parthenogenesis, has quality advantage)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(parthenogenesis, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(insect, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(parthenogenesis, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(parthenogenesis, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cougar, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(parthenogenesis, has quality advantage)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(insect, has quality good)